Exit this survey

NFRC Summer *Virtual* Committee Week 2011
Meeting Survey & Feedback Collection
Please share your feedback regarding the NFRC's Summer Virtual Committee Week, July 18-20, 2011 in this brief survey.  Your feedback is essential; we appreciate your candid responses.
1
*Overall, please tell us how productive the meeting was using a 1 to 5 scale where 1 means not at all productive and 5 means extremely productive.
Not at all productiveNot that productiveSomewhat productiveVery productiveExtremely productive
Pre-Meeting Communications & Tools
2
*

Please tell us your level of agreement with the following statements about the pre-meeting items using a 1 to 5 scale, where 1 means you strongly disagree and 5 means you strongly agree.

<Thank you for your patience as we continue to ask and measure/monitor these important questions>

Strongly disagreeDisagreeNeither agree nor disagreeAgreeStrongly agree
The NFRC's mailed postcard serves as a reminder of the tools available for preparing for the meeting.
The pre-meeting emails and posts to the website were useful to me for setting deadlines and preparing for the meeting.
I find NFRC's Blog updates, Facebook and Twitter accounts (General/NFRC Windows or Meetings) a helpful way to learn about NFRC meeting activities.
3
Additional Comments or other ways NFRC can improve pre-meeting communications:
4
For those that attended one of the NFRC's Virtual Training Sessions (July 7 or July 12): The goal was to help all registrants be as prepared as possible for a successful Committee Week.  Please provide input on topics that you feel needed more time - or additional items that you feel should have been included in the training? 
NFRC Summer **Virtual** Committee Week - Logistics
5
*

Please submit your feedback on the virtual meeting logistics.  Tell us your level of agreement with the following statements using a 1 to 5 scale, where 1 means you strongly disagree and 5 means you strongly agree.

Strongly DisagreeDisagreeNeither Agree nor DisagreeAgreeStrongly Agree
The meeting flowed smoothly.
There was enough time allotted each day for the topics at hand.
The meeting leader(s) effectively moderated the meeting. (Staff)
Meeting attendees had ample opportunity to participate (overall).
I find the NFRC Program Booklet and Ballot Items a useful tool throughout the conference.
The NFRC virtual meeting is a good value for the registration cost.
6
Were there any topics that needed more time and attention?
7
*

NFRC used Citrix's GOTO Webinar Software to organize and facilitate the Virtual Committee Week as well as RW Poll to facilitate voting.  We will continue to explore creative solutions to improve the meeting experience working within the confines of current technology; however we do appreciate all feedback.  Please take a moment to rate the following meeting tools using a 1 to 5 scale, where 1 means you are extremely dissatisfied and 5 means you are extremely satisfied.

Extremely DissatisfiedDissatisfiedNeither Satisfied nor DissatisfiedSatisfiedExtremely SatisfiedN/A
Registration Process.
RWPoll website for Voting (members only.)
Hand Raise Feature to Cue for Speaking.
Attendee Support via submit question feature.
8
*
Did you have others in your office participate; not logged in - but observing and giving feedback? 

NFRC Meeting Structure - General and Future Considerations

<Thank you for your patience as we continue to ask and measure/monitor these important questions>

9
*When evaluating sites for our face to face meetings, there are many factors taken into consideration. Please rank the following options in order of importance to you with 1 being unimportant (not a consideration) and 3 being extremely important to you.
UnimportantImportant ConsiderationExtremely Important
Cost and convenience of transportation to the host city
Quality of meeting facility (lighting, A/V, design of meeting rooms)
Cost of hotel/lodging
Tourist attractiveness of host city/region
Location of Hotel to outside attractions
Alignment of NFRC meeting with other industry events (time and place)
10
*
NFRC continues to explore options for submittal of votes at NFRC Meetings both virtual and face to face.  Please let us know in what ways would you feel comfortable submitting votes?  (select any/all that apply).
 

Delivering Information To You:

The NFRC has a diverse membership that appreciates obtaining information in various ways.  As we look to the future we hope to ensure that as many stakeholders as possible are able to easily access necessary information.  We are looking for your feedback on your current social networking interest/usage.  Please take a moment to answer the following.

<We will be continuing to ask this question over the next several meetings to monitor interest/growth - your patience & participation is appreciated.>

11
*What social media do you utilize for professional networking/information:
12
*Please answer the following questions based on your usage of the following tools:
NeverRarelySometimesOftenAlways
I looked at the NFRC Blog during the NFRC Committee Week to read news items/updates of the day's activities.
I look to the NFRC Blog (http://nfrcnews.blogspot.com) between NFRC Meetings to find industry news/information.
I take advantage of twitter alerts or texts to remind me of NFRC Committee Week deadlines and additions to the website. 
I would be interested in additional alerts or texts via twitter during the meeting to let me know of subcommittees or committees start times/changes other.
13
General Comments or Feedback on the NFRC's Summer **Virtual** Committee Week 2011:
14
*Thank you for your time and participation in the NFRC processes.  If NFRC Staff can be of any assistance, please don't hesitate to be in contact with us.

We look forward to seeing all of our active stakeholders for

the NFRC's Fall Membership Meeting in

Atlanta, Georgia: November 7-10, 2011.