Javascript is required for this site to function, please enable.
Page:  
1. Faculty Status
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
lecturer
10.8%7
half time
6.2%4
full time
83.1%54

2. If you are a lecturer, how many credits are you teaching this semester? (leave blank if you are not a lecturer)
 answered question9
 
skipped question
56
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1 0.0%0
2 0.0%0
3
33.3%3
4
11.1%1
5 0.0%0
6
11.1%1
7
11.1%1
more than 7
33.3%3

3. If you are a lecturer, for how many successive semesters have you been at WCC? (leave blank if you are not a lecturer)
 answered question8
 
skipped question
57
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1
12.5%1
2 0.0%0
3
25.0%2
4
12.5%1
more than 4
50.0%4

4. If you are half-time or full-time, the number of years you have been at WCC, including this year (leave blank if you are a lecturer).
 answered question53
 
skipped question
12
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
1-5
26.4%14
6-10
9.4%5
11-15
7.5%4
16-20
28.3%15
more than 20
28.3%15

5. Faculty Rank
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Lecturer
12.3%8
Instructor
20.0%13
Assistant Professor
13.8%9
Associate Professor
10.8%7
Professor
43.1%28

6. Unit or Department
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Academic Support
12.3%8
Business Education and Technology
9.2%6
Essential Skills
6.2%4
Humanities
18.5%12
Language Arts
10.8%7
Mathematics and Business
7.7%5
Natural Sciences
13.8%9
Social Science
6.2%4
Trades
3.1%2
Student Services
12.3%8

7. Are you familiar with the Windward Community College Mission Statement?
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 Response
Percent
Response
Count
Yes
96.9%63
No
3.1%2

8. Mission Statement

"Windward Community College is committed to excellence in the liberal arts and career development; we support and challenge individuals to develop skills, fulfill their potential, enrich their lives, and become contributing, culturally aware members of our community."
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 excellentsatisfactoryless than satisfactorypoorunable to judgeRating
Average
Rating
Count
Adequacy of the Mission Statement description of the mission of Windward Community College40.0% (26)49.2% (32)7.7% (5)0.0% (0)3.1% (2)1.7765

9. Academic Quality
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 excellentsatisfactoryless than satisfactorypoorunable to judgeRating
Average
Rating
Count
Overall quality of the education provided to students at WCC36.9% (24)52.3% (34)4.6% (3)0.0% (0)6.2% (4)1.8665
Overall quality of the education in my department/program49.2% (32)46.2% (30)3.1% (2)0.0% (0)1.5% (1)1.5865
Overall quality of WCC graduates9.2% (6)70.8% (46)3.1% (2)1.5% (1)15.4% (10)2.4365
Overall teaching competency of WCC faculty36.9% (24)49.2% (32)3.1% (2)0.0% (0)10.8% (7)1.9865
Overall relevance of courses to college requirements33.8% (22)53.8% (35)1.5% (1)0.0% (0)10.8% (7)2.0065
Overall currency and relevance of the curriculum29.2% (19)44.6% (29)12.3% (8)0.0% (0)13.8% (9)2.2565

10. Faculty/Student Involvement in Campus Decision-making
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 excellentsatisfactoryless than satisfactorypoorunable to judgeRating
Average
Rating
Count
Overall involvement of faculty in campus decision-making12.3% (8)61.5% (40)13.8% (9)9.2% (6)3.1% (2)2.2965
Overall involvement of students in campus decision-making3.1% (2)36.9% (24)18.5% (12)13.8% (9)27.7% (18)3.2665
Overall involvement of faculty in the budgeting process7.7% (5)36.9% (24)32.3% (21)10.8% (7)12.3% (8)2.8365
Overall involvement and the role of faculty in setting campus priorities7.7% (5)46.2% (30)24.6% (16)10.8% (7)10.8% (7)2.7165
Overall involvement of faculty in the campus hiring process26.2% (17)47.7% (31)12.3% (8)3.1% (2)10.8% (7)2.2565
Overall involvement of faculty in the scheduling of course offerings18.5% (12)46.2% (30)13.8% (9)7.7% (5)13.8% (9)2.5265
Overall involvement of faculty in the curriculum approval process29.2% (19)49.2% (32)9.2% (6)1.5% (1)10.8% (7)2.1565
Overall involvement of faculty in the program review process15.4% (10)55.4% (36)10.8% (7)1.5% (1)16.9% (11)2.4965

11. Leadership
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 excellentsatisfactoryless than satisfactorypoorunable to judgeRating
Average
Rating
Count
Overall effectiveness of the UH Board of Regents in governing WCC and other community colleges3.1% (2)46.2% (30)20.0% (13)7.7% (5)23.1% (15)3.0265
Overall effectiveness of the current community college system administrative structure7.7% (5)46.2% (30)24.6% (16)6.2% (4)15.4% (10)2.7565
Overall effectiveness of articulation agreements/processes within UH system1.5% (1)21.5% (14)41.5% (27)18.5% (12)16.9% (11)3.2865
Overall effectiveness of the UH system President24.6% (16)58.5% (38)4.6% (3)1.5% (1)10.8% (7)2.1565
Overall effectiveness of the WCC Chancellor 20.0% (13)44.6% (29)18.5% (12)9.2% (6)7.7% (5)2.4065
Overall accessibility of the WCC Chancellor to faculty32.3% (21)44.6% (29)13.8% (9)4.6% (3)4.6% (3)2.0565
Overall effectiveness of the Dean of Instruction38.5% (25)35.4% (23)12.3% (8)3.1% (2)10.8% (7)2.1265
Overall effectiveness of the Assistant Dean of Instruction32.3% (21)35.4% (23)15.4% (10)4.6% (3)12.3% (8)2.2965
Overall effectiveness of the Assistant Dean of Academic Support21.5% (14)44.6% (29)7.7% (5)1.5% (1)24.6% (16)2.6365
Overall effectiveness of the Dean of Student Services26.2% (17)40.0% (26)13.8% (9)1.5% (1)18.5% (12)2.4665
Overall effectiveness of the Director of Administrative Services15.4% (10)56.9% (37)10.8% (7)1.5% (1)15.4% (10)2.4565
Overall effectiveness of the Director of Vocational and Community Education47.7% (31)30.8% (20)4.6% (3)0.0% (0)16.9% (11)2.0865
Overall effectiveness of the campus administrative organization10.8% (7)52.3% (34)20.0% (13)4.6% (3)12.3% (8)2.5565
Overall effectiveness of Faculty Senate leadership18.5% (12)46.2% (30)18.5% (12)9.2% (6)7.7% (5)2.4265
Overall attitude of campus administration toward faculty involvement in decision-making18.5% (12)43.1% (28)16.9% (11)9.2% (6)12.3% (8)2.5465
Overall effectiveness of communication channels to resolve problems12.3% (8)40.0% (26)26.2% (17)12.3% (8)9.2% (6)2.6665
Overall effectiveness of college committees12.3% (8)60.0% (39)13.8% (9)6.2% (4)7.7% (5)2.3765
Overall effectiveness of Faculty Senate committees10.8% (7)58.5% (38)12.3% (8)6.2% (4)12.3% (8)2.5165
Overall availability of opportunities to evaluate college governance and decision-making process12.3% (8)35.4% (23)27.7% (18)10.8% (7)13.8% (9)2.7865

12. Professional Development Climate
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 excellentsatisfactoryless than satisfactorypoorunable to judgeRating
Average
Rating
Count
Adequacy of campus support for educational innovation12.3% (8)55.4% (36)21.5% (14)7.7% (5)3.1% (2)2.3465
Adequacy of opportunity and support to pursue scholarship9.2% (6)41.5% (27)24.6% (16)12.3% (8)12.3% (8)2.7765
Adequacy of administration recognition of faculty excellence18.5% (12)44.6% (29)20.0% (13)10.8% (7)6.2% (4)2.4265
Adequacy of support to attend professional meetings13.8% (9)46.2% (30)24.6% (16)9.2% (6)6.2% (4)2.4865
Adequacy of study leave/sabbatical opportunites3.1% (2)20.0% (13)29.2% (19)20.0% (13)27.7% (18)3.4965
Adequacy of support for faculty professional development13.8% (9)44.6% (29)29.2% (19)10.8% (7)1.5% (1)2.4265
Adequacy of student evaluation of instructors10.8% (7)60.0% (39)13.8% (9)7.7% (5)7.7% (5)2.4265
Adequacy of professional development efforts in helping to deal with special-needs students3.1% (2)56.9% (37)20.0% (13)7.7% (5)12.3% (8)2.6965
Overall effectiveness of peer evaluation process in improving my teaching6.2% (4)63.1% (41)15.4% (10)9.2% (6)6.2% (4)2.4665
Overall quality of collegiality among faculty20.0% (13)50.8% (33)21.5% (14)6.2% (4)1.5% (1)2.1865
Overall quality of collegiality between faculty and administrators18.5% (12)58.5% (38)16.9% (11)6.2% (4)0.0% (0)2.1165
Overall degree of academic freedom on campus35.4% (23)44.6% (29)9.2% (6)1.5% (1)9.2% (6)2.0565

13. Support Services
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 excellentsatisfactoryless than satisfactorypoorunable to judgeRating
Average
Rating
Count
Adequacy and quality of services provided by the Library33.8% (22)50.8% (33)4.6% (3)3.1% (2)7.7% (5)2.0065
Adequacy and quality of services provided by the Learning Center36.9% (24)47.7% (31)3.1% (2)0.0% (0)12.3% (8)2.0365
Adequacy and quality of services provided by the Media Center23.1% (15)46.2% (30)12.3% (8)9.2% (6)9.2% (6)2.3565
Adequacy and quality of services provided by Student Services20.0% (13)63.1% (41)7.7% (5)0.0% (0)9.2% (6)2.1565
Adequacy and quality of services provided by the Admission and Records Office36.9% (24)44.6% (29)3.1% (2)0.0% (0)15.4% (10)2.1265
Adequacy and quality of services provided by the Financial Aid Office 40.0% (26)38.5% (25)1.5% (1)0.0% (0)20.0% (13)2.2265
Adequacy of availability of student financial aid 18.5% (12)40.0% (26)6.2% (4)0.0% (0)35.4% (23)2.9465
Adequacy of student help availabilty3.1% (2)38.5% (25)30.8% (20)9.2% (6)18.5% (12)3.0265
Adequacy of secretarial/clerical support12.3% (8)52.3% (34)30.8% (20)0.0% (0)4.6% (3)2.3265
Adequacy of placement testing9.2% (6)43.1% (28)15.4% (10)3.1% (2)29.2% (19)3.0065
Adequacy of student counseling13.8% (9)47.7% (31)18.5% (12)4.6% (3)15.4% (10)2.6065

14. Facilities and Equipment
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 excellentsatisfactoryless than saisfactorypoorunable to judgeRating
Average
Rating
Count
Adequacy of faculty offices18.5% (12)43.1% (28)27.7% (18)6.2% (4)4.6% (3)2.3565
Adequacy of classrooms18.5% (12)53.8% (35)24.6% (16)1.5% (1)1.5% (1)2.1465
Adequacy of laboratories, shops and studios18.5% (12)41.5% (27)13.8% (9)1.5% (1)24.6% (16)2.7265
Adequacy of maintenance of buildings 15.4% (10)53.8% (35)21.5% (14)3.1% (2)6.2% (4)2.3165
Adequacy of maintenance of grounds26.2% (17)43.1% (28)21.5% (14)4.6% (3)4.6% (3)2.1865
Adequacy of maintenance and replacement of equipment4.6% (3)44.6% (29)33.8% (22)7.7% (5)9.2% (6)2.7265
Adequacy in timeliness of completion of work orders12.3% (8)50.8% (33)20.0% (13)7.7% (5)9.2% (6)2.5165
Adequacy of parking23.1% (15)52.3% (34)16.9% (11)7.7% (5)0.0% (0)2.0965
Overall quality of campus facilities and equipment12.3% (8)66.2% (43)20.0% (13)0.0% (0)1.5% (1)2.1265
Overall quality of facilities and equipment for my program16.9% (11)52.3% (34)27.7% (18)3.1% (2)0.0% (0)2.1765
Overall safety of buildings and equipment12.3% (8)58.5% (38)23.1% (15)3.1% (2)3.1% (2)2.2665
Adequacy of security guard coverage6.2% (4)43.1% (28)33.8% (22)12.3% (8)4.6% (3)2.6665
Adequacy of lighting for campus security6.2% (4)47.7% (31)29.2% (19)9.2% (6)7.7% (5)2.6565
Adequacy of campus accessibility and accommodation for persons with disabilities7.7% (5)55.4% (36)13.8% (9)6.2% (4)16.9% (11)2.6965

15. Technology Resources
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 excellentsatisfactoryless than satisfactorypoorunable to judgeRating
Average
Rating
Count
Adequacy of classroom instructional equipment12.3% (8)63.1% (41)15.4% (10)4.6% (3)4.6% (3)2.2665
Adequacy of classroom AV equipment13.8% (9)60.0% (39)16.9% (11)3.1% (2)6.2% (4)2.2865
Overall reliability of classroom AV equipment4.6% (3)63.1% (41)18.5% (12)6.2% (4)7.7% (5)2.4965
Overall availability of cable television in the classroom3.1% (2)16.9% (11)18.5% (12)16.9% (11)44.6% (29)3.8365
Adequacy of the campus interactive education system (HITS) for instructional needs6.2% (4)16.9% (11)16.9% (11)6.2% (4)53.8% (35)3.8565
Adequacy of access to a computer30.8% (20)52.3% (34)13.8% (9)1.5% (1)1.5% (1)1.9165
Adequacy of access to software21.5% (14)46.2% (30)18.5% (12)4.6% (3)9.2% (6)2.3465
Adequacy and speed of campus computer network26.2% (17)55.4% (36)10.8% (7)3.1% (2)4.6% (3)2.0565
Overall effectiveness and response of academic technology support services (i.e., help desk, training, trouble-shooting, etc.)33.8% (22)43.1% (28)16.9% (11)1.5% (1)4.6% (3)2.0065
Overall effectiveness and response of administrative technology support services (i.e., help desk, training, trouble-shooting, infrastructure, etc.)32.3% (21)38.5% (25)15.4% (10)1.5% (1)12.3% (8)2.2365
Adequacy of campus telephone system12.3% (8)70.8% (46)15.4% (10)0.0% (0)1.5% (1)2.0865

16. Personnel Policies
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 excellentsatisfactoryless than satisfactorypoorunable to judgeRating
Average
Rating
Count
Adequacy of current salary schedule1.5% (1)61.5% (40)24.6% (16)9.2% (6)3.1% (2)2.5165
Adequacy of faculty classification policy (rank system)7.7% (5)63.1% (41)20.0% (13)4.6% (3)4.6% (3)2.3565
Adequacy of information regarding benefits15.4% (10)67.7% (44)13.8% (9)3.1% (2)0.0% (0)2.0565
Overall level of current teaching workload6.2% (4)50.8% (33)16.9% (11)18.5% (12)7.7% (5)2.7165
Overall level of current non-teaching workload (i.e., advising, committee work, etc.)3.1% (2)49.2% (32)16.9% (11)16.9% (11)13.8% (9)2.8965
Overall equitable assignment of evening/weekend teaching duties3.1% (2)40.0% (26)13.8% (9)10.8% (7)32.3% (21)3.2965
Overall effeciveness and fairness of evaluation of faculty by administrators9.2% (6)49.2% (32)10.8% (7)10.8% (7)20.0% (13)2.8365
Overall effectiveness and fairness of tenure/promotion process12.3% (8)50.8% (33)16.9% (11)1.5% (1)18.5% (12)2.6365
Overall quality of the campus faculty hiring process13.8% (9)56.9% (37)15.4% (10)1.5% (1)12.3% (8)2.4265

17. Student Characteristics
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 excellentsatisfactoryless than satisfactorypoorunable to judgeRating
Average
Rating
Count
Overall availability of accurate, up-to-date research on student outcomes1.5% (1)29.2% (19)29.2% (19)16.9% (11)23.1% (15)3.3165
Overall satisfaction with the general competence level of the students at the college3.1% (2)55.4% (36)26.2% (17)7.7% (5)7.7% (5)2.6265
Overall satisfication with general student interest and motivation7.7% (5)53.8% (35)23.1% (15)7.7% (5)7.7% (5)2.5465
Overall satisfaction with college effort to assist poorly prepared students15.4% (10)43.1% (28)24.6% (16)7.7% (5)9.2% (6)2.5265
Overall availability of opportunities for faculty to support and interact with students12.3% (8)63.1% (41)9.2% (6)7.7% (5)7.7% (5)2.3565

18. Overall Satisfaction
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 excellentsatisfactoryless than satisfactorypoorunable to judgeRating
Average
Rating
Count
Overall level of satisfaction with WCC working/learning environment26.2% (17)53.8% (35)16.9% (11)3.1% (2)0.0% (0)1.9765
Overall level of satisfaction with UH system environment9.2% (6)50.8% (33)30.8% (20)6.2% (4)3.1% (2)2.4365

19. Participation in the College's Milieu
 answered question65
 
skipped question
0
 alwaysmost of the timesometimesneverRating
Average
Rating
Count
I am an active participant in overall college affairs30.8% (20)44.6% (29)20.0% (13)4.6% (3)1.9865
I provide leadership to the college through my activities36.9% (24)44.6% (29)13.8% (9)4.6% (3)1.8665
I provide constructive information with which to improve the college35.4% (23)41.5% (27)20.0% (13)3.1% (2)1.9165
I am an a contributing member of campus committees46.2% (30)35.4% (23)13.8% (9)4.6% (3)1.7765

20. Please offer any suggestions that you may have for improving the college
 answered question23
 
skipped question
42
 Response
Count
 23

Find...
Show replies
Hide replies